Blog
Charged EVs | EV charging is changing, Part 1: How automakers’ disappointment in Electrify America drove them into Tesla’s arms
Aug
Coming quickly:
Half 2: No, NACS is just not right this moment’s Tesla connector
Half 3: Why Tesla’s NACS is unlikely to kill CCS
Half 4: Behind the scenes of seven automakers reply to Tesla’s Superchargers
EV charging is altering, however a lot stays to be settled
A flurry of reports over lower than a yr completely altered the US panorama for EV charging. Now comes the arduous work of constructing all of it occur.
The final yr has seen extra change within the EV charging panorama than at any time because the VW Group agreed in June 2016 to pay $2 billion to arrange a nationwide quick charging community within the US to settle its Dieselgate scandal.
In November 2022, Tesla launched specs for what it dubbed the North American Charging Standard (NACS), basically providing it to the EV trade at massive. Tesla followers hailed the transfer as one other stroke of genius by the corporate that proved to the world that long-range EVs might be viable, enticing and worthwhile. The remainder of the world possible paid little consideration.
Now, inside solely three months:
- A deluge of assist for adoption of the Tesla connector adopted. As of its newest replace on August 18, the EV Adoption Tesla NACS Charger Adoption Tracker web page confirmed 53 corporations planning to make use of the connector;
To place these startling developments in context, Charged interviewed greater than a dozen executives, engineers and analysts from automakers, DC quick charging community operators, charging {hardware} companies and different companies. Each individual we spoke with needed to speak—to vent, even—and to share conversations they’d had and anecdotes they’d heard from others within the enterprise.
Nonetheless, nearly nobody was prepared to go on the file, reflecting the sensitivity of ongoing negotiations, the technical challenges of a brand new charging connector and the difficult internet of relations among the many many events throughout the EV charging ecosystem. Solely Ford supplied written responses to (a number of of) our questions.
General, this yr’s developments mirror deep dissatisfaction amongst automakers aside from Tesla with the state of US quick charging—accompanied by concern that Tesla’s ultra-reliable and deeply built-in Supercharger community has given it a everlasting aggressive benefit.
Fury at Electrify America
It’s arduous to overstate the disgust and anger at Electrify America amongst nearly each individual we interviewed. The community has come to be seen, pretty or not, as essentially the most minimal effort VW Group may have exerted to adjust to the 10-year, $2-billion settlement it collectively negotiated with the EPA and the California Air Assets Board (CARB).
5 years after its first quick charging station went dwell in Could 2018, Electrify America continues to have websites down for weeks or months and different areas the place just one or two cables (out of 4, six or eight) really ship a cost. Whereas a majority of its stations will recharge an EV, the extensively touted commonplace uptime determine of 97 p.c nonetheless interprets to 11 days a yr of downtime for each location. Would you’ve got confidence in your native fuel station in case you knew it could be darkish nearly two weeks a yr—at random?
EA has steadfastly refused to debate its reliability statistics, providing years of bland reassurances that issues are bettering. It is not going to launch particulars on its investigations into instances wherein its charging stations apparently delivered sufficient extra energy to journey the high-voltage fuses in three different EVs in three different states. However it’s possible a significant contributor to EV charging issues quantified in current studies by J.D. Power and the University of California, Berkeley.
Non-Tesla automakers have had it with EA. Preliminary hopes that EA would offer a brand new, large-scale, nationwide community of quick charging stations have now curdled right into a need to see EA out of the sport altogether—with “plenty of dangerous blood” directed on the VW Group as a complete.
Tesla apart, all networks are perceived to be extra targeted on getting new stations within the floor—and related picture ops with native politicians—than funding operations and upkeep. Kameale C. Terry, the CEO of ChargerHelp, which repairs charging stations, tweeted in December 2021, “I just lately spoke to a program supervisor for EV charging at a significant utility and he mentioned, ‘I’ve $18 million to construct new EV chargers and $0 to repair the damaged ones beforehand deployed.’ ”
Whereas EVgo, Shell Recharge (née Greenlots), ChargePoint and others had been included in reliability complaints, these networks are seen—rightly or wrongly—as much less unreliable than EA. “EA is by far essentially the most troublesome community for us to work with,” mentioned one automaker worker. “It’s simply not clear they consider in it, or that they’re in it for the lengthy haul.”
In different phrases, non-Tesla automakers have had it with EA. Preliminary hopes that EA would offer a brand new, large-scale, nationwide community of quick charging stations have now curdled right into a need to see EA out of the sport altogether—with “plenty of dangerous blood” directed on the VW Group as a complete. One engineer and one govt even prompt that Volkswagen intentionally did a subpar job. “Bear in mind Dieselgate?” mentioned one. “Idiot me as soon as, disgrace on you. Idiot me twice…”
One engineer and one govt even prompt that Volkswagen intentionally did a subpar job. “Bear in mind Dieselgate?” mentioned one. “Idiot me as soon as, disgrace on you. Idiot me twice…”
Ford’s Tesla shock
In some methods, Ford has been essentially the most aggressive automaker in working towards a great charging expertise for its EV consumers. It included Plug and Charge in its Mustang Mach-E from its late 2020 launch, replicating the Tesla “plug within the automotive and stroll away” expertise lengthy earlier than different mass-market manufacturers did the identical. And it claims to have tracked each failed charging try by way of telematics and labored to know what went unsuitable. Electrify America was by far the commonest thread amongst all failed costs by Mach-E drivers, in keeping with a supply.
Ford analyzed the networks, websites and even charging {hardware} in these failed makes an attempt, and put pressure on the networks involved. It additionally launched a gaggle of “Cost Angels,” who traveled amongst charging websites, testing the reliability and situation of chargers and reporting again.
None of that appears to have been sufficient. Nonetheless, there was nonetheless widespread shock when Ford introduced that its EV drivers would acquire entry to the Tesla Supercharger community from Spring 2024. Initially, they might join by way of adapter cables; in the end, Ford will construct the Tesla receptacle into its future EV fashions. Tesla will provide each NACS-to-CCS and CCS-to-NACS adapters, Ford instructed Charged, although costs haven’t been launched.
Subsequent, Half 2: No, NACS is just not right this moment’s Tesla connector.
Be aware: Tesla calls its proprietary connector and protocols the “North American Charging Normal,” or NACS. It isn’t (but) a technical commonplace, as are the connector and protocols for SAE J-1772 for AC charging and the Mixed Charging Normal (CCS) used (in two variants) in North America and Europe. In November, Tesla mentioned it’s “actively working with related requirements our bodies to codify Tesla’s charging connector as a public commonplace.” For comfort, the time period NACS could also be used on this article to consult with the Tesla charging system.
